text | home
text | big pictures
text
2017 Consultation
Suite of Consultation Documents
As part of the statutory consultation under section 47 of the Planning Act 2008 a suite of consultation documents relating to the proposal to reopen Manston Airport is available to the public. Together these documents give an overview of the development proposals including information on the potential benefits and impacts of the Project, environmental considerations and the business case. The documents also provide further information on the consultation process and enable the public to submit their feedback.
This consultation also forms part of RiverOak's initial engagement on the design of airspace and procedures associated with the airport. As such it is an opportunity for members of the community to highlight any factors which they believe RiverOak should take into account during that design phase. Having taken all such factors into account, the subsequent proposals for flightpaths and airspace will be subject to a separate round of consultation once the DCO application has been made.
The suite of consultation documents includes:
a Consultation Leaflet giving an overview of the proposals and details of where more information about the Project can be found;
a Feedback Form in order to collect responses to the consultation;
an Overview Report giving a summary of the proposals including the potential benefits and impacts of the Project, how we propose to mitigate against potential impacts, and a non-technical summary of the Preliminary
Environmental Information Report (PEIR);
a Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR); containing preliminary information on the likely environmental effects of our proposals as we have ascertained them so far, including noise, transport and air quality, and how we propose to minimise these effects, as well as how we propose to maximise the benefits of the Project;
a draft Masterplan for Manston Airport;
Manston Airport - a Regional and National Asset, Volumes I-IV; an analysis of air freight capacity limitations and constraints in the South East and Manston's ability to address these and provide for future growth;
an Outline Business Case;
a Statement of Community Consultation;
a Location Plan; and
an Interim Consultation Report, setting out the details of the first stage of consultation and how feedback received has been used to help develop the proposals.
This Preliminary Environmental Information Report has been prepared pursuant to the Infrastructure Planning
(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009, as amended.
3
1 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK LimitedFigures
Figure 1.1
|
Site Location and Study Areas
|
Figure 1.2
|
Site Plan
|
Figure 3.1
|
Site Location Plan
|
Figure 3.2
|
Existing Site Facilities
|
Figure 3.3
|
Existing Layout in the Context of EASA Requirements
|
Figure 3.4
|
Zoning Plan
|
Figure 3.5
|
Site Layout Plan
|
Figures 3.6-3.9
|
Indicative Visuals of the Proposed Development
|
Figure 3.10
|
Runway Pavement Improvement
|
Figure 3.11
|
Runway-Taxiway Alpha Interference
|
Figure 3.12
|
Obstacle Limitation Surface (OLS) Requirements (Cargo Area)
|
Figure 3.13
|
Lighting Scheme
|
Figure 3.14
|
Cargo Area Layout Plan
|
Figure 3.15
|
Passenger Area Layout Plan
|
Figure 3.16a
|
Indicative Design for the Passenger Terminal Building
|
Figure 3.16b
|
Indicative Visuals of the New Spitfire & Hurricane Memorial Museum
|
|
Building
|
Figure 3.16c
|
Indicative Visuals of the ATC Tower
|
Figure 3.17
|
Car Parking, Public Transport and Cycle Facilities
|
Figure 3.18
|
Passenger Facilities
|
Figure 3.19
|
Proposed Site Access, and Highway and Junction improvements
|
Figure 3.20
|
Landscaping Scheme
|
Figure 3.21
|
Outline Drainage Strategy
|
Figure 3.22a
|
Existing Contours
|
Figure 3.22b
|
Proposed Contours
|
Figure 3.22c
|
Proposed Contours Plan Cargo Area
|
Figure 3.23
|
Cross-sections of Proposed Development
|
Figure 3.24
|
Route of Discharge Pipelines and Location of Outfall
|
Figure 3.25
|
Northern Area Development
|
Figure 3.26
|
Technical Safeguarding Plan for Proposed Layout
|
Figure 3.27
|
Phase 1 Phasing Plan
|
Figure 3.28
|
Phase 2 Phasing Plan
|
Figure 3.29
|
Phase 3 Phasing Plan
|
Figure 3.30
|
Phase 4 Phasing Plan
|
|
|
May 2017
|
|
38199CR019i3
|
|
2 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK LimitedFigure 3.31
|
Phase 1 Construction Operations
|
Figure 3.32a
|
Indicative Air Space Routes - Runway 28 (Approaches from the East)
|
Figure 3.32b
|
Indicative Air Space Routes - Runway 10 (Approaches from the West)
|
Figure 3.32c
|
Indicative Air Space Routes - Runway 10 (Departures and Early Turn
|
|
Departures to the East)
|
Figure 3.32d
|
Indicative Air Space Routes - Runway 28 (Departures to the West)
|
Figure 5.1
|
Cumulative Effects Assessment - Other Developments
|
Air Quality (figures are embedded within the ES Chapter)
|
|
Figure 6.1
|
Locations of long-term human receptors
|
Figure 6.2
|
Locations of short-term human receptors
|
Figure 6.3
|
Locations of AQMA receptors (near)
|
Figure 6.4
|
Locations of AQMA receptors (far)
|
Figure 6.5
|
Locations of ecological receptors (near)
|
Figure 6.6
|
Locations of ecological receptors (far)
|
Figure 6.7
|
Locations of monitor receptors (near)
|
Figure 6.8
|
Locations of monitor receptors (far)
|
Figure 6.9
|
The vicinity of the proposed development, showing AQMA and continuous
|
|
monitor
|
Figure 6.10
|
Monitoring Locations
|
Figure 6.11
|
Monitored annual mean NO2 (ìg m-3), averaged 2007-2015
|
Figure 6.12
|
Annual mean NO2 concentrations (ìg m-3) from Defra data
|
Figure 6.13
|
Schematic of emission disaggregation for approach
|
Figure 6.14
|
Schematic of emission disaggregation for initial climb and climb-out
|
Figure 6.15
|
Schematic of emission disaggregation for taxiing, hold, take-off roll,
|
|
pushback and APU
|
Figure 6.16
|
Schematic of emission disaggregation for landing roll, brake wear and tyre
|
|
wear
|
Figure 6.17
|
2012 Wind Rose
|
Figure 6.18
|
2013 Wind Rose
|
Figure 6.19
|
2014 Wind Rose
|
Figure 6.20
|
2015 Wind Rose
|
Figure 6.21
|
2016 Wind Rose
|
Figure 6.22
|
Specimen Critical Load function for acidity
|
Figure 6.23
|
Annual mean NO2 process contribution, Year 20, near the airport
|
Figure 6.24
|
Annual mean NO2 process contribution, Year 20 (wider area)
|
Figure 6.25
|
Annual mean PM10 process contribution, Year 20, near the airport
|
|
|
May 2017
|
|
38199CR019i3
|
|
3 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK LimitedFigure 6.26
|
Annual mean PM10 process contribution, Year 20 (wider area)
|
Figure 6.27
|
Annual mean PM2.5 process contribution, Year 20, near the airport
|
Figure 6.28
|
Annual mean PM2.5 process contribution, Year 20 (wider area)
|
Figure 6.29
|
Annual mean NOx process contribution, Year 20, near the airport
|
Figure 6.30
|
Annual mean NOx process contribution, Year 20 (wider area)
|
Biodiversity
|
|
Figure 7.1
|
Statutory Designated Nature Conservation Sites
|
Historic Environment
|
|
Figure 9.1
|
Designated Heritage Assets
|
Figures 9.2a-h
|
Non-designated Assets (HER)
|
Figures 9.3a-h
|
Archaeological Events (HER)
|
Landscape and Visual
|
|
Figure 11.1
|
LVIA Study Area
|
Figure 11.2
|
Zone of Theoretical Visibility and Viewpoint Locations
|
Figure 11.3a
|
Annotated Daytime Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 1 & 2
|
Figure 11.3b
|
Annotated Daytime Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 3 & 4
|
Figure 11.3c
|
Annotated Daytime Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 5 & 6
|
Figure 11.3d
|
Annotated Daytime Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 7 & 8
|
Figure 11.3e
|
Annotated Daytime Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 9 & 11
|
Figure 11.3f
|
Annotated Daytime Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 12 & 13
|
Figure 11.4a
|
Annotated Night-time Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoints 1 & 7
|
Figure 11.4b
|
Annotated Night-time Viewpoint Photography: Viewpoint 14
|
Figure 11.5
|
Principal Settlements whose residents are included in Visual Assessment
|
Figure 11.6
|
Large groups of properties whose residents are included in Visual
|
|
Assessment
|
Figure 11.7
|
Small groups of properties whose residents are included in Visual
|
|
Assessment
|
Figure 11.8
|
Long Distance Recreation Routes
|
Figure 11.9
|
Recreation Destinations
|
Figure 11.10
|
Individual and groups of Public Rights of Way whose users are included in
|
|
Visual Assessment
|
Figure 11.11
|
Landscape Character Areas
|
Figure 11.12
|
Comparative Tranquillity Levels
|
Figure 11.13
|
Comparative Light Pollution Levels
|
Figures 11.14a-c
|
Visualisation 1
|
|
|
May 2017
|
|
38199CR019i3
|
|
4 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK LimitedFigures 11.15a-c Visualisation 2
Noise and Vibration
Figure 12.1 Sound Survey Monitoring Locations
Figure 12.2 Sound Survey Observation Locations
Socio-economic (figures are embedded within the ES Chapter)
Figure 13.1 Thanet District
Figure 13.2 Population Profile in Thanet by Age and Gender
Figure 13.3 Population Projections in Thanet by Age 2011 - 2031
Figure 13.4 Index of Multiple Deprivation (2015) at Neighbourhood (LSOA) Scale
Figure 13.5 Primary Schools in East Kent by Capacity
Figure 13.6 Secondary Schools in Thanet by Capacity
Figure 13.7 Primary Healthcare Facilities and A&E Attendance in Thanet
Figure 13.8 Registered Businesses by Geography 2015
Figure 13.9 Number of VAT-registered businesses in Thanet 2004 - 2011
Figure 13.10 Five-year Survival Rates of Businesses by Geography
Figure 13.11 Postcodes within the study area
Traffic and Transport
Figure 14.1 Site Context Plan
Figure 14.2 Accident Assessment Area and Accident Locations
Figure 14.3 Potentially Affected Groups or Locations
Figure 14.4 Locations Requiring Further Assessment